Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> (2015-08-12): > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Thanks! Does the hazardous sed call touching debian/rules now account > > for the dh_makeshlibs call(s) that might have been missed previously? > > I don't know about dh_makeshlibs calls specifically. The script is not > perfect, and there have been some manual fix-ups needed for some source > packages prepared using this script. Two cases that I know of: > > - if using d-shlibs (which... don't. thanks), you need to pass a --v5 > option to it in debian/rules. > > - if your debian/rules is very manual and includes things like > dh_suchnsuch -p<runtimelibpkg> [...] in it, this script fails to fix > those up (due to lack of whitespace before the package name). > > The second of these may be the problem you're describing wrt dh_makeshlibs? > > Anyway, both of these issues are fixable in the script with some additional > seddery, if someone is so inclined. > > > (I've hinted jmw in this direction a few days ago for libktoblzcheck1c2a > > vs. libktoblzcheck1v5 as seen in NEW, and you might have been notified > > afterwards; maybe fixing this was just a matter of throwing debian/rules > > at the end of the said sed call, and all is well already.) > > Sorry, I hadn't heard anything about libktoblzcheck. It seems Matthias fixed it this way: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/libktoblzcheck/wily/revision/40 which matches the second case you were describing: no space before package name because it's glued to the -V. A few various ways seen through codesearch: -V'libfoo …' -V"libfoo …" -V 'libfoo…' -V "libfoo…" It might be a good idea to adjust the script before using it on too many packages. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature