Re: LFS status, and enabling it opportunistically on next SONAME bump
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Our Large File Support on some 32-bit architectures is a bit poor, and
> this has been going on for a while now:
That tag has severity minor and is marked experimental while LFS was a release
goal. If the experimental flag gets removed then it would show up on
and it might make more people aware of it.