söndagen den 14 juni 2015 22.38.28 skrev Vincent Lefevre: > Well, there are two things that one wants to avoid: > > 1. Upgrading libgnutls-deb0-28 to a version using libnettle6 without > upgrading the packages that depend on libgnutls-deb0-28 and use > libnettle4. This is the problem I've mentioned here. And there's > now the following bug reported by Felipe Sateler: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788735 But libgnutls-deb0-28 technically doesn't break libnettle4, nor does libnettle6. It's only certain combinations of three or more packages that are broken, something the dependency system can't handle. Declaring libnettle6 to break rdeps known to be built against libnettle4 might be the best option but then again there could be versions in backports with lower version numbers yet built against libnettle6. Right? -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@debian.org Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.