Re: mudlet bug #787354: icon had wrong license
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if
> > > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the
> > > file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically a
> > > documentation issue rather than a licensing one. Assuming that's the case,
> > > no separate update for Jessie would be required.
> > Thanks, I'll document and downgrade (to make it non-RC) the bug.
> > Yes, its a purely a documentation issue.
>
> Ähm, just a question: the license is *non-commercial*. Is it really
> distributable in main then? I'd guessed not, but I'm happy to learn
> something new...
It's a documentation issue, not a license issue. ie what is written is
not what they wanted to say.
Essentially:
Me: "Hey this is a NC license"
Them: "Oops, sorry, its supposed to be GPL"
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Reply to: