Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 01:34:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 554FEAF0.40108@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150510013227.GA24314@gaara.hadrons.org>
References: <[🔎] 20150510013227.GA24314@gaara.hadrons.org>

On 05/10/2015 03:32 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> CC_FOR_BUILD = gcc

the above mentioned wiki pages still talk about HOSTCC and BUILDCC. Please
clarify when to use these. Are the names now final?  Also I don't see OBJC and
OBJCXX in use, and GOC and GDC are missing.

Matthias

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

References:
- Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: enable stateless persistant network interface names
Next by Date: Re: Proposal: enable stateless persistant network interface names
Previous by thread: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler
Next by thread: Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread