Re: Stetch goal: improvements to testing-proposed-updates / experimental?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Stetch goal: improvements to testing-proposed-updates / experimental?
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 08:41:41 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150502064141.GB5650@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <878udb1knx.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>
- References: <CAJS_LCUtc6hzD8nfmR-+LLnmXy73EE6QVgxvvgXZ6_H+bdRJHA@mail.gmail.com> <878udb1knx.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:02:58AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > - during the freeze, uploads to unstable that bump sonames should be held
> > for RM review (or that will otherwise prevent new uploads of other packages
> > to unstable from being suitable for promotion to testing)
>
> The soname stuff, going through NEW, is partly done manually by the
> ftpteam already.
As far as I remember the discussion was not triggered on a soname bump
but rather on a bump on the version of r-base which requires all its
rdepends to build against this. I have no idea how you want to flag
bumps like these automatically.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: