On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 08:37 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few > > weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and > > nnn-submitter@ should be no different from mailing nnn@, and until I > > allow submitters to opt out of e-mail, mailing nnn-submitter@ should be > > no different from e-mailing nnn@ either. > > I'd very much appreciate the ability to not be auto-subscribed to > every bug so please do implement the opt-out thing, preferably before > this change is rolled out. > > Personally, I think subscriptions should work like this: > > The default should be to auto-subscribe submitters and contributors to bugs. [...] No, this would turn the BTS into a (worse) spam vector. But the acknowledgement mail should tell you how to subscribe, if you aren't already subscribed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part