Re: length of a package extended description
2015-01-10 4:31 GMT+01:00 Russ Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Don Armstrong <email@example.com> writes:
>> It would probably be ideal if there was a better way of indicating which
>> latex modules were in each texlive package than currently, but until a
>> better method is found, this is probably the best of bad options.
> +1. I cannot overstate how useful it is to have this sort of thing appear
> in a field searchable by apt-cache.
> We have enough packages with this issue that maybe it would be worth
> designing some other way to allow this, but until then, please keep the
> lists in packages like this or firmware-linux-nonfree so that apt-cache
> search can find the right package. And having at least *some* description
> for humans to view with a pager and forward search is really nice.
A possible solution designed for this kind of issue could be DEP-11.
Unfortunately, not even the AppStream part of this thing is ready yet,
but I am certain that we will have it for Stretch.
(and can then extend it for useful usecases)
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/