[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: none

]] Ludovico Cavedon 

> I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but:
> - ntop has version 3:5.0.1, ntopng 1.2.1. I would need to bump the ntopng version to 4, and I am not very excited by that
> - there is no migration path from ntop to ntopng. All settings and data would be lost, therefore I am concerned that people would be disappointed if at point their instance of ntop is replaced with ntopng with default credentials, maybe on a different port.
> Should I just request the removal of ntop instead?

Given there's no migration path, I think making sure ntop's mentioned in
ntopng's description and just removing ntop would make sense.

Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Reply to: