Re: Bug#754513: ITP: libressl -- SSL library, forked from OpenSSL
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:43:27AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > That turns smaller adjustments in applications into
> > developing entirely different interfaces for each application, while
> > GnuTLS itself still lacks a lot of features.
>
> Do you have any reference for this? I have not followed this closely
> but historically GnuTLS seemed to do very well feature wise (e.g.
> early TLS 1.2 support).
I was referring to the paper from utexas, linked to in a different post,
but mistakenly counted the errors listed there (7 out of 16) as missing
features.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Reply to: