Re: sysvinit is still here, and here to stay for jessie (was Re: systemd is here to stay, get over it now)

[The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 07/04/2014 10:42 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 09:52:07AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> 
>> So, let me get this straight:
>> 
>> You're saying that if, having decided to postpone rebooting after
>> an upgrade where any reasonable person would expect to reboot
> 
> This is Debian, not Windows or Red Hat, forced reboots are not
> acceptable.
> 
> There was enough trouble when udev needed an in-lockstep upgrade with
> the kernel a few releases back.  If systemd components are going to
> need such forced reboots on a repeated basis, I don't like where this
> is going.

To be fair, I don't think anyone has suggested that reboots would be
required "on a repeated basis" - only on the initial transition.

- --
   The Wanderer

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.

A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=qkRr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----