Re: MATE 1.8 has now fully arrived in Debian
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: MATE 1.8 has now fully arrived in Debian
- From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 01:53:06 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140702005305.GT10647@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20140630094359.GA11619@upsilon.cc>
- References: <1403945784.2088.5.camel@PackardBell-PC> <m3k381l7uy.fsf@neo.luffy.cx> <1403950748.24256.3.camel@kagura.malsain.org> <m3fvipl3h7.fsf@neo.luffy.cx> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1406282139270.19536@herc.mirbsd.org> <20140629092150.GF1406@sid.nuvreauspam> <53B05344.5000205@debian.org> <87zjgurdpa.fsf_-_@xoog.err.no> <20140630092749.GF5004@mavolio.codethink.co.uk> <20140630094359.GA11619@upsilon.cc>
+++ Stefano Zacchiroli [2014-06-30 11:43 +0200]:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] Thomas Goirand
> > > > +1 for keeping the name which is funny
>
> What's funny about an OS stating publicly that a specific piece of Free
> software---shipped and installed by default by that very same OS---"must
> die"?
Every package name in debian is not a 'statement of the OS' as a
whole. Each one is just a package name, most of which are vaguely
descriptive, some are punny, many rather cryptic. None that I can
think of are a 'statement'.
The systemd people won the argument. Giving those who prefer not to
use it (yet) a slightly childish package to install is a small
consolation for them and really shouldn't be taken very seriously. I'm
afraid the name amused me - and I assume I'm not the only one.
But OK. I get it - this is still too contentious to have any room for
this sort of foolishness and if it's to exist at all it'll have to be
called something boring. That's a little sad, but we'll all
survive. This isn't supposed to be a big deal, just a small
convenience.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
Reply to: