Re: Technical committee acting in gross violation of the Debian constitution
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Technical committee acting in gross violation of the Debian constitution
- From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weigelt@gr13.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:58:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 54811F6D.7040401@gr13.net>
- In-reply-to: <20141125173038.GB23835@varinia.lobefin.net>
- References: <20141116001628.GO32192@teltox.donarmstrong.com> <1416249514.4599.15.camel@kagura.malsain.org> <20141117191508.GL4015@rzlab.ucr.edu> <1416255656.6444.34.camel@kagura.malsain.org> <1416257119.6444.41.camel@kagura.malsain.org> <20141122011336.GB29130@nl.grid.coop> <547495E0.7040306@gr13.net> <20141125160359.GB6563@smurf.noris.de> <loom.20141125T174344-513@post.gmane.org> <20141125173038.GB23835@varinia.lobefin.net>
On 25.11.2014 18:30, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Excellent. I'm sure that if they can create a deb, they can install
> sysvinit, or runit, or some BSD, or whatever else they want. A default
> is only a default, after all.
Just curious about the term "default":
Can I still install a system w/o systemd ever going into my system -
instead of replacing it later (eg. some option in the installer) ?
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt,
metux IT consulting
+49-151-27565287
Reply to: