Re: policy regarding redistributable binary files in upstream tarballs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 19/11/14 20:33, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 19, Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> wrote:
>
>> Should the upstream tarball be repackaged to remove them, or
>> not?
> They do not need to be removed at least if they can be rebuilt from
> the source in the package (but they do not have to).
>
It probably makes life easier for the FTP masters to check things if
you do remove them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=fLTe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: