Re: veto?

[zlatan <zlatan@riseup.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Please no.

We need less and not more layers of governance/'political' complexity in project. Lets stop acting like government  and more like community.

Cheers,

zlatan

On 12 November 2014 11:04:05 CET, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:
>
>
>It is very sad to see that contributors sometimes feel that the only
>option for them is to resign.
>
>Would it be worthwhile giving people another option, for example,
>allowing a percentage of DDs to formally veto decisions?  Would this be
>better than people leaving outright?
>
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>listmaster@lists.debian.org
>Archive: [🔎] 54633095.9060903@pocock.pro">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 54633095.9060903@pocock.pro

- --
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.9

iQJSBAEBCAA8BQJUY06jNRxabGF0YW4gVG9kb3JpYyAoRGViaWFuZXIpIDx6bGF0
YW4udG9kb3JpY0BnbWFpbC5jb20+AAoJEC5cILs3kzv91W4P/ixE9NWYWVL6iw86
yvyUfngp8FHtOWUHFc/4LyhV2tyXbew6KYs+er1dpyFTr/5/8qBmuNTwJ26IIxov
oyGR375mu1ocAV9gZyB8Ny4EnCAif5WQhhzgtufEG0jgLW0ds0htiH4ph5S+GKk6
q0trXhoyuirhzhk897qbeodW5Tb66+q591pO64fT0szWHE3XK8vScwsA6vdtG+yg
56Mn4KSSzWEivhgSZrYB76kc7bIcOK4uoFxg84UJ1GQ4SRZIcQGSQg98DkT1fWFH
SQj/Qx7QuHjl3bkB3ZoNaZ/OUPqGU5kUp11XrXjZHFKvgIvUJjVWqRQh7GdVL/ap
Emze2u+cELcXuQu3uJRbLyTImYM7jPrlGf7OXFWZeIbQU6HyNcfV6elAO3/3jSr7
Mo636sJsOsaKwpLcl9i/u/8WBGghwZWlWrcReoIr4aUULKds/SDaYP8npoAaSKv9
xpm8apkUuuOK9rfd6qx7KAnnkMwhApWWQE07qDau7s15DzG2wJyoZUNEapFXmtUf
hdwRJq6n7eAmtVF53ENOQzB0UDpcBFEn7Fi9LxLhl0DuGqLo6GjPKAnQ/QcOcIlP
IDyDVb95Mw5do2M4JLAe1dPbcB//m3WRwrtIhw0CZHkArgtty5wJ1Gf3fFkkhEd0
5vi4O6YOmZ+qGDw7JXtU8JfJ7kUb
=PNj6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----