On 11/01/2014 at 07:38 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively >> rebuilding all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent >> version numbers across architectures before releasing Jessie? > [...] >> A few random packages that currently have an inconsistent version: > > did you notice any problem with those? There shouldn't and if there > are, those are bugs. binNMU differences should have no effect > whatsover, except that they are a visual glitch. I've noticed upgrade-time problems from what I think is this same issue, for cases when one package depends on an exactly-equal version of another package, and the other package got a +bX version bump but the depending package didn't. I don't know how common such situations are, but they do seem to occur, and to be more than a visual glitch. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature