[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New dash in experimental

On 20/10/2014 13:50, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> sofia-sip 1.12.11+20110422.1-2 Failed [UNKNOWN] /bin/sh: 4: pushd: not
> found
>> bashism, you should reportbug that, RC severity (Policy 10.4)
> hdf-eos4 2.19v1.00+dfsg.1-1 Failed [UNKNOWN] ../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: not found
> libvisca 1.0.1-1 Failed [UNKNOWN] ../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: not found
> ntop 3:5.0.1+dfsg1-2 Failed [UNKNOWN] ./libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: not found
>> (incidentally, all those += as well)
This looks like a false positive in testing. hdf-eos4 at least uses the
system libtool
(which has moved from libtool to libtool-bin, leading to a FTBFS I need
to fix).
The system libtool has an explicit #!/bin/bash

> To be completely fair, you should repeat the very same source package
> builds, with the very same archive snapshot in use (actually, for
> rebuilds like this, using snapshot.d.o as the *only* entry in
> sources.list, for both deb and deb-src, is the way to go) as during
> the initial rebuild against the new dash version, to diff failures.
> (Or rebuild stock archive first, filter out failures, then rebuild
> what built.) bye, //mirabilos 

Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written.

Reply to: