Hi, Marco d'Itri: > On Oct 11, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > > but if a user > > wants to use /bin/posh, that's an individual user's choice :-) > We have no obligation to support every bad idea that people have. > Policy effectively states that Debian packages shall not depend on any features which posh doesn't have. So in what way is that a bad idea, and how should one know beforehand? This is about redirecting /bin/sh to another supposedly-compatible shell, not /bin/false. … though I have to admit that I'm looking forward to the day when that would work, simply because there's no longer a shell involved in booting my system. -- -- Matthias Urlichs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature