bugreports to systemd are getting rejected
Hello,
this is getting embarrassing. Sorry for the noise but every time I try
to report a bug to systemd, I am getting a failure of delivery. This
only happens with systemd, I can report bugs to other packages just fine.
I'm forwarding the message. Slightly edited to remove the gmail account
that I use to forward emails out from my personal machine.
This is the 3rd bug that I try to report that gets this response. I've
already privately informed other people about this problem and
apparently nothing was done because I still can't submit bugs.
Could you please let people submit bugs, so that they can be fixed? The
alternative is releasing a buggier stable Debian.
Best
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:45:52 +0000
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
To: my-supersecret-address@gmail.com
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
submit@bugs.debian.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
for the recipient domain bugs.debian.org by buxtehude.debian.org.
[140.211.166.26].
The error that the other server returned was:
550 malware detected: Sanesecurity.Junk.3451.UNOFFICIAL: message rejected
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date;
bh=pDEdtm6sB6nDTZFwLBDSCWBGAiVv5OFdnXqjp1O0kJU=;
b=UQSHx+bo7g33pYJQ8529HVfvKEZVai6gfhx2hRsmymtmXpn8D+ngoZiNhu+sNldiiD
I9haM7dWvgb39ddEGfUsZXfeCYZGfFKs0d/2CZkaN4w43iKkIcdm/G6Bdj9aPmgQ2OIu
AicDi9b7uXW+JE4Vebs8pTHPqLYvruU5zVvZH5oeieR6i1ik0WQERs5PY9AlUPLdzKWg
6OJPSCqV+m2ObrwPG5JWVDYGIwePYLq9lRPPswMvz0gB9TUcKEJg1Xm8xBqEtF6AsBpO
oTDmNSExCN81a8erd1IBDwrSwMxScVgITxG3WHKJgczwLVgDZ8ZmKNkaCa0yEeOGhG03
MIzQ==
X-Received: by 10.181.27.132 with SMTP id jg4mr6243363wid.28.1412959544263;
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <my-supersecret-address@gmail.com>
Received: from hal9000 ([151.74.244.147])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
eg8sm3175548wib.15.2014.10.10.09.45.38
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Salvo Tomaselli <my-supersecret-address@gmail.com>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hal9000 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A14BDFA49;
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:45:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===============1018610572898679071=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: systemd: ignores user settings and shuts systemd down when
power button is
pressed
Message-ID: <20141010164536.2544.59159.reportbug@localhost>
X-Mailer: reportbug 6.5.1
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:45:36 +0200
Package: systemd
Version: 215-5+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
despite I have a script listening to events from acpid, which I use to
decide which
actions to take when ACPI events occur, my system was just going off
whenever I
would press the power button.
It appears that the culprit is systemd.
According to the manpage, the default values for this file
/etc/systemd/logind.conf
are set so that systemd will shutdown the system in case the power
button is pressed.
Once upon a time, this was done by acpid, which would first check if
there were sessions
open, and then decide what to do.
If you think that systemd should take over and replace acpid, it should:
behave in the same
way, by default, and provide a unix socket that lists the events, for
backwards compatibility.
In any case, I think that the default values in that file are not sane,
because for example,
if I tried to configure KDE to do something when the power button is
pressed, systemd would
still shutdown the system.
Best, and thanks for your work!
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.4a (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages systemd depends on:
ii acl 2.2.52-2
ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
ii initscripts 2.88dsf-53.4
ii libacl1 2.2.52-2
ii libaudit1 1:2.4-1
ii libblkid1 2.25.1-3
----- Message truncated -----
Reply to: