Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:33:50 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140928083350.GA4738@riva.ucam.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140928021144.GE1755@nl.grid.coop>
References: <[🔎] 20140927153218.GB1755@nl.grid.coop> <[🔎] 20140927163017.GA7300@grep.be> <[🔎] 20140927181845.GA2816@gaara.hadrons.org> <[🔎] 20140927184257.GA26444@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20140928021144.GE1755@nl.grid.coop>

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 09:11:44PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> Does update-menus really need bash? Why?

pipefail is actually a fairly useful bashism.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Russell Stuart <ras@debian.org>

References:
- bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org>
- Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
  - From: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org>

Prev by Date: Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
Next by Date: Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
Previous by thread: Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
Next by thread: Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread