Re: Trimming priority:standard
Sorry for top-posting
Installing both is a waste of bandwidth (for netinst) and disk space. There are lovers of both, but most desktop users will never see any of the two.
Having one easy text editor in command line is necessary. Both nano or joe will make that target. None of emacs nor vi does: they are not as easy.
Regards
Noel
Enviado de Samsung Mobile
-------- Mensaje original --------
De: Ansgar Burchardt
Fecha:17/09/2014 7:58 (GMT+00:00)
Para: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Asunto: Re: Trimming priority:standard
Noel Torres <envite@rolamasao.org> writes:
> On Tuesday, 16 de September de 2014 22:17:51 Joerg Jaspert escribió:
>> On 13698 March 1977, Didier Raboud wrote:
>> >> > One thought... there will probably be trademark concerns with
>> >> > "unix".[1] So we might have to choose a name for the tasksel task
>> >> > to be someting like "unix-like".
>> >>
>> >> Or we could just call it "standard system".
>> >
>> > Could we make sure the full "vim" is in that then? I miss it on every
>> > new installation and I'm quite sure that's not uncommon.
>>
>> ONLY if we put emacs there too, cos I miss that way more than any vi*
>> ever. With vi actually being the first thing to get removed, so that
>> would be better way out of standard *IMO*
>>
>> (*lala*)
>
> Trying to start another flamewar? Let's stop this here. There are vi lovers and
> emacs lovers, and having the freedom to choose is great.
That's why *both* should be installed by default. Then everybody will be
happy.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 851traivhk.fsf@tsukuyomi.43-1.org
Reply to: