Re: systemd, again
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:05:52AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.09.2014 01:37, schrieb Adam Borowski:
> > This is easily fixable by adding such a dependency, or making things simpler
> > by dropping the sysvinit-core package at all, returning its contents back to
> > sysvinit. In fact, this whole split was done in a NMU by a systemd
> > maintainer, so no wonders it's behaving this way.
>
> Steve Langasek, who did the sysvinit/sysvinit-core split, will be
> interested to hear that he is now considered a systemd maintainer.
Ah sorry, I misread a recent changelog entry done by you.
My bad.
--
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices.
Reply to: