Le primidi 1er fructidor, an CCXXII, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > The problem was enforcing patch review policies. No, it never was. > There's been a very well commented technical reason stated here: the > release team don't want to deal with 2 of the same library that are > doing (nearly) the same things That the reason for keeping only one; other have discussed the validity of the reason. The reason for switching from FFmpeg to libav in the first place just after the fork is much simpler than that. > Yeah. If both were fully compatible, there would be no issue using one > or the other. Are there known current cases where FFmpeg can not emulate libav? Regards, -- Nicolas George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature