[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#753704: ITP: amap -- Next-generation scanning tool for pentesters

Le Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:33:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > 
> > > This violates the Policy's section 10.1, but it is still my favorite solution
> > > for the reason that you explained above.
> > 
> > I don't agree, packages should not be in conflict when it can be easily avoided
> > by renaming files.
> +1

Hi Andreas,

Feel free to rename yourself, but do not forget to remove me from the uploaders

On my side I find these renamings harmful and illogical.  The probability that
people want to use both amaps on the same machine is close to zero, and the
probability that users of both amaps will be annoyed by the rename is close to
one.  I think that these renamings are applied dogmatically in a way that makes
Debian inferior.  I do not want to participate to this.


Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Reply to: