[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#753704: ITP: amap -- Next-generation scanning tool for pentesters

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > 
> > This violates the Policy's section 10.1, but it is still my favorite solution
> > for the reason that you explained above.
> I don't agree, packages should not be in conflict when it can be easily avoided
> by renaming files.




Reply to: