Re: systemd is here to stay, get over it now
Juliusz Chroboczek <email@example.com> writes:
> I'll remind you that this thread started with systemd breaking my
> system, and a systemd maintainer summarily closing my bug report. Not
> once, but twice.
Because the bug was already fixed in a newer version of systemd. While
we're reminding people of things.
> Summarily dismisisng non-systemd issues, unfortunately, is the kind of
> attitude that we've come to expect from many (not all) systemd
I believe the description of what happened as "summarily dismissing" is
factually inaccurate. In fact, he investigated and confirmed that the bug
was already fixed and closed it accordingly. You have a legitimate cause
for complaint, which I think has already been heard and registered, that
the response was too terse and that you didn't realize this is what the
response meant, but the problem was not dismissed.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>