Re: Avoiding system d
Hi,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez:
> "[...] they don't want you to have the option of NOT using their stuff.
> """ http://www.landley.net/notes.html#23-04-2014
>
IMHO this is a gross mis-characterization.
A whole lot more correct IMHO would be the idea that their developer time
is best spent fixing the bugs / anachronisms / take-your-pick in other
packages so that they work with systemd, instead of implementing soon-to-
be-obsolete and nontrivial-to-maintain workarounds within systemd.
It's also demonstrably false. Otherwise systemd would not be compatible
with existing SysV init scripts (to the point that I can run them manually
and, if they happen to load the LSB stuff, they transparently redirect
themselves through systemd), systemd would not forward to rsyslog, …
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
Reply to: