[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd - some more considerations



On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:33:42PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Tollef,
> 
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76935
> > 
> > That's being moved to systemd.debug instead of overloading debug.
> 
> Good news. And please make Kay excuse for his rudeness and ifgnorance.
> Thanks for letting us know.
> But why is that not mentioned in the bug report? What is systemd
> maintainers approach to handling bugs??
> 
> > > * systemd maintainers (Lennart Poettering) does not care for
> > >   segfaults in his code, even if it happens in pid 1.
> > > 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74589
> > 
> > systemd needs cgroups, that's pretty well established.  Arguably, it
> > should die with a clearer message.
> 
> No, NO  NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
> 
> *IT*SHOULD*NOT*DIE*!!! It is in PID 1. Please digest that.

You could very well say the same thing about a 64-bit kernel dying on a 32-bit
system. SystemD depends on Linux precisely because of its cgroups integration.

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: