Re: contrib and nonfree distribs
Le 3 mars 2014 à 13:59, forum::für::umläute <zmoelnig@umlaeute.mur.at> a écrit :
> assuming for a second that you are not trolling,
>
> On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote:
>> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
>>
>
> hmm.
> but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does
> the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is
> proprietary.
>
> another random example: the existence of "ubuntu" does not mean, that
> Debian is (say) "owned by canonical".
>
> fgsdfm
> IOhannes
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 53147CA0.1070604@umlaeute.mur.at">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 53147CA0.1070604@umlaeute.mur.at
>
The installer recommend "contrib" and "nonfree"...
Reply to: