Re: contrib and nonfree distribs
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: contrib and nonfree distribs
- From: forum::für::umläute <zmoelnig@umlaeute.mur.at>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:59:12 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 53147CA0.1070604@umlaeute.mur.at>
- In-reply-to: <4E9BEE82-8EF2-4C11-80FC-9A7D55746156@me.com>
- References: <DB2F0F4E-6F63-4246-A1CD-7A509F378633@me.com> <16222294.MY3ZqxpDRV@grep.be> <FCD81AAB-A4A6-46AB-A602-E927769485D1@me.com> <5592138.XxamxfmNTL@grep.be> <4E9BEE82-8EF2-4C11-80FC-9A7D55746156@me.com>
assuming for a second that you are not trolling,
On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote:
> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
>
hmm.
but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does
the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is
proprietary.
another random example: the existence of "ubuntu" does not mean, that
Debian is (say) "owned by canonical".
fgsdfm
IOhannes
Reply to: