Am 18.02.2014 19:18, schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud: > Le mercredi, 19 février 2014, 00.56:07 Thomas Goirand a écrit : >> On 02/18/2014 11:10 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55:32PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>>> Once I consider OpenRC ready for it, would it be ok to just replace >>>> sysv-rc by OpenRC, and transform sysv-rc into a transitional >>>> package? >>>> What is the opinion of other DDs? Is there anyone which would like >>>> to >>>> keep the old featureless sysv-rc? >>> >>> What problem does that solve? >> >> In this way, we'd have only 2 init systems to take care of, and we >> could start replacing init.d scripts by OpenRC runscripts *IF* >> there's a systemd service file. > > Yes. And three different daemon-starting syntaxes to manage the Wheezy- > to-Jessie upgrades. > > Again, for Jessie, I don't think it's reasonable to change the default > init _and_ replace the common baseline. I, for one, am not going to > replace my awkward-but-working sysvinit scripts by anything but > systemd/upstart unit files and that is doomed to happen in jessie+1 . I'd like to add that switching to openrc breaks the SysV/LSB support in systemd. Openrc doesn't use the /etc/rc?.d/ directories to create the symlinks which signal if a service is active for a given runlevel. (those symlinks are created in /etc/runlevel/* afaics) This means systemd doesn't consider the SysV/LSB init script as enabled and won't start it on boot. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature