Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation
On 13481 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Thank you Lucas for your efforts, but I think that the best would have
> been to ignore the complaints that led you to change the delegation.
Its still done after getting input from the secretary ruling that it
must be different than what was there. And while I disagree with the
secretaries opinion on that (I do think it should be possible to
delegate that the policy editors DOCUMENT policy and not SET policy
without having the non-allowed "how to do their work" inside), it is a
task that shouldn't be ignored forever.
> Basically, the Policy delegates are in charge of the Policy, the
> Release delegates are in charge of the Release, the Archive delegates
> are in charge of the Archive, etc.
I don't think we disagree here, and as Lucas has stated that he wants to
update the delegation, by now it is mostly an "editorial change". I bet
we can come up with a wording that wont have the side effects we just
saw.
--
bye, Joerg
Reply to: