On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:31:15AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > That said, I am curious if there would be any opposition to an upload of > > cyrus-sasl2 2.1.26 into unstable. Aside from opposition, are there any > > other comments that anyone would like to offer in regard to this? > > Well, it has to go to unstable eventually, doesn't it? Might as well do it > now unless it would cause trouble with some ongoing transition. > > That said, it is probably a good idea to check upstream's git repo for fixes > to 2.1.26. > I agree. The only question I have at this point is what special action needs to be taken with regard to the libsasl2-2 -> libsasl2-3 transition that is introduced with the 2.1.25 -> 2.1.26 update. For the time being, I am focusing on preparing only a 2.1.26 upload for unstable, but I will wait to upload it until the transition question is addressed. I apologize if this seems elementary, but I have not been responsible for any significant library transition yet. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature