Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> writes:
> On 28 January 2014 04:08, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
>> (And, regardless, the telnet implementation really needs to go away.)
> I don't know what problems telnet has, however I suspect you will find
> the Kerberos ftp to be equally as bad.
I believe ftp at least uses GSS-API and has some degree of crypto agility.
Kerberized telnet is DES-only.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to:
- References:
- Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Joshuah Hurst <joshhurst@gmail.com>
- Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
- Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Simon Toedt <simon.toedt@gmail.com>
- Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: remove krb5-appl (rlogin, rsh, telnet, ftp with krb5 support)
- Index(es):