Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful
From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.10.1401061102320.3857@tglase.lan.tarent.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140105145737.GA17522@scru.org>
References: <20131223224354.GA9871@scru.org> <[🔎] 52C831C1.9000008@debian.org> <[🔎] 20140105145737.GA17522@scru.org>

On Sun, 5 Jan 2014, Clint Adams wrote:

> because any code under this license would be deliberately incompatible
> with anything else FOR NO GOOD REASON.

Uhm, then stop advocating the GNU GPL, which is deliberately incompatible
with anything else FOR NO GOOD REASON.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
[16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini"
[16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"...

Reply to:

References:
- Re: GnuTLS in Debian
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful [was Re: GnuTLS in Debian]
  - From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#734354: ITP: fonts-croscore -- width-compatible fonts for improved on-screen readability
Next by Date: Re: Delegation for the Release Team
Previous by thread: Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful [was Re: GnuTLS in Debian]
Next by thread: Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful [was Re: GnuTLS in Debian]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread