[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful [was Re: GnuTLS in Debian]

Hi there!

On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 04:29:02 +0100, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>> > So your doomsday scenario is that if you license something
>> > GPLv2+, someone might fork and modify it to be GPLv3+,
>> I was under the impression that forks couldn't change licenses. Is the
>> scenario which Clint describes (legally) possible?
> I drew up this table a few weeks back when someone was misunderstanding
> the GPL combination stuff.
> /
> |                      HELPFUL GPL UPGRADE TABLE

Without checking in details Paul's table, upstream FAQ contains a
commented matrix where copying and usage are separate (as it should):


Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: