[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GnuTLS in Debian



On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 19:52 +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > How to continue from here/solve this:
> > ---------
> > #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
> 
> This seems like the best idea, as it lets us use newer versions of
> GnuTLS that support elliptic curves with the minimum amount of pain.

I think this would be a good idea if GnuTLS doesn't depend on too many
features of newer GMP.

[...]
> > #6 Move to GnuTLS3, drop GnuTLS2. Packages which cannot use GnuTLS3
> > for license reasons will need to drop TLS support or be relicensed or
> > be ported to a different TLS library.
> 
> I don't think this option is a good idea.  It will leave git without
> HTTPS support, since libcurl3-nss doesn't actually work for HTTPS.
> libcurl3-nss requires an additional library not in Debian for the crypto
> support to work at all, and despite me filing bugs, neither the NSS nor
> the curl maintainers have stepped up to fix this.
> 
> This also doesn't consider the fact that NSS provides poorer crypto
> support than either OpenSSL or GnuTLS, although it's getting better.

The free software world desparately needs a permissively licenced TLS
library with sane default behaviour.  OpenSSL or GnuTLS seem to have
failed us on both grounds, and I hope interested developers will
cooperate with the Fedora developers in making NSS usable by more
applications.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: