[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why not to let all DDs to execute "gb"-command



Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > I think, most of developers are clever enough to define, whether the
> > built failed "accidentally" and needs to be restarted, or it requires
> > some fixing and uploading new version. It will save time for both DDs
> > and wb-team.
> 
> Generally I'd have liked that. Currently there's no proper scheme to
> authorize only that action (wb talks directly to the DB and does the
> changes). That said, many requests seem to be "let's retry that, maybe
> it doesn't fail" (for SIGSEGV/SIGBUS). The interface should at least
> encourage developers to think twice.

if the DPAs get wanna-build support (which I hope) you certainly don’t
want to handle nmu and gb requests for every developer’s pet
repositories, so there will be a need for a general interface. Can this
be done using dcut files, just as with other DPA management commands?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: