> Hi, > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > > > > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > > > > * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past > > > > 14 days. > > > > * If a bug is assigned to multiple packages, both packages will be > > > > affected. > > > > * The RC bug affects both unstable and testing. > > > > * The affected package does not have any reverse dependencies in > > > > testing. > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > +1 > > I also like it, somewhat, but am also aware of this approach rendering > unstable more stable than testing. I would prefer another kind of punishment > for neglect / some difficulty than the mere removal. > [...] In what way exactly would this effort even affect unstable? Note that this is about removal from *testing*, thus should rather remove the number of bugs in testing, not necessarily in unstable!? Best, Michael
Attachment:
pgpPv0k1uOOn3.pgp
Description: PGP signature