Re: Switching to mozilla ESR in stable-security
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Switching to mozilla ESR in stable-security
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:24:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130601112400.GA10014@xvii.vinc17.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <loom.20130531T105043-909@post.gmane.org>
- References: <20130528203303.GA5425@pisco.westfalen.local> <201305301406.43631.odyx@debian.org> <87y5awljc7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <201305301520.29815.odyx@debian.org> <20130530132922.GB6316@upsilon.cc> <51A78C69.40303@debian.org> <51A78FFD.9020404@debian.org> <87wqqgz708.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <loom.20130531T105043-909@post.gmane.org>
On 2013-05-31 08:52:37 +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery <rra <at> debian.org> writes:
> [...]
> > This would *enable* users to install software from backports if it either
> > didn't exist in stable at all or if they explicitly requested it from
> > backports, but would not install such software by default.
>
> Packages which, by the way, are not supported by the security team.
Is it important? Doesn't upstream (here, Mozilla) do a good job
concerning security?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: