On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 08:30:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op 28-11-13 21:04, Niels Thykier schreef: > > It has also come to our attention that a few buildds do not use > > throw-away chroots. This sometimes results in unclean builds and we > > have therefore decided to only consider architectures which use > > throw-away chroots for all suites on all buildds as candidate release > > architectures. > > You're talking about praetorius here. > > It will revert to throwaway chroots the minute LVM gets unbroken in stable. > There's a few solutions here: - praetorius is disabled - you get over your objections to tarball-based schroots - somebody else runs praetorius But we feel that reusing chroots is just no longer acceptable. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature