Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system
- From: Jonathan Dowland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:55:54 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20131111075554.GB19995@bryant.redmars.org>
- In-reply-to: <526EA7B5.email@example.com>
- References: <20131025122954.GA9101@bongo.bofh.it> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <loom.20131025T155807email@example.com> <20131025141920.GA6532@helios.pault.ag> <loom.20131025T162545firstname.lastname@example.org> <20131025143147.GA7082@helios.pault.ag> <loom.20131025T170115email@example.com> <526A9201.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20131028102822.GA7454@jwilk.net> <526EA7B5.email@example.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:06:45AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Please rename /sbin/rc to something else. We've had (unrelated)
> > /usr/bin/rc in Debian for at least 18 years.
> Outch! This bites hard. Maybe you being the maintainer of the "rc"
> package is why you saw this immediately! :)
> Though that's annoying, because upstream must extensively uses "rc". All
> OpenRC commands are in fact using /sbin/rc. For example, /bin/rc-status
> (which shows what is a symlink to /bin/rc, and then /sbin/rc finds out
> that it has been called by using /bin/rc-status, so it prints the status.
Is there much chance of convincing upstream to consider a migration to
another binary name, perhaps "openrc"? If it's a difficult and complex
change it would be best if it was performed upstream I think. Although
it took Debian to notice the clash, the clash may be a problem for
others as well.
FWIW /usr/bin/rc is an interesting shell and worth a look for those who
aren't already familiar with it.