On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 07:57:50 +0300 Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala@pp1.inet.fi> wrote: > I am no longer willing to assume that Steve Langasek would act in good > faith in evaluating init systems; he has posted false claims about > systemd too many times for me to believe they would all be honest > mistakes, and has posted what has clearly been deliberate FUD. This > independently of and in addition to any conflict of interest. I don't see how that is relevant to the project. AFAICT you are not directly involved in Debian and would have no vote if this did go to a GR, neither are you involved in packaging systemd for Debian. https://nm.debian.org/public/people https://alioth.debian.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=100797 http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/systemd/unstable_changelog Whether or not the project has confidence in the Technical Committee has nothing to do with your opinions, which are blatantly biased. If there are people inside Debian (i.e. people who would have a vote in a Debian GR or who are actively involved in packaging) who have no confidence in the Debian Technical Committee to come to a fair decision for the benefit of all of Debian then I would be concerned. That random people not involved in Debian have prejudged individual members is of no concern. > > No matter what gets decided, some people aren't going to like it > > and will complain. True, but it's the people doing the work in Debian who matter in respect of this decision. That is where the resolution of this problem must take place - the opinions of those not doing any of the work, ultimately, count for nothing. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature