Re: Proposal: switch init system to systemd or upstart
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013, 14:29:54 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> It is more and more obvious that modern software needs an event-based
> init system.
> - more features
> - stable support for advanced boot/SAN environments
> - being more similar to one of the other relevant distributions (RHEL or
> - things like gnome become easier to package
> - some work to do (how much depends on the choice and on the details.
> but keeping sysvinit on life support is not free either)
> Since the init system strongly shapes many other packages, there has to
> be only one and no other supported options.
I am just packaging a few packaging that I get sponsored from time to time,
but for me for systemd to be acceptable a thing like
upower: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are
systemd: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are
Bug#727645: polkit-kde-1: requires root password for hibernate, wrongly
reports other users are logged on
have to be solved *first*.
And as a user / tester of systemd I don´t even care as to where the fix has to
be made or whether systemd or something else is made responsible for the
But so far I have the impression my #717… bug reports back in June has been
met with quite some amount of ignorance. Now someone else also reported it.
And since it happens for any KDE + systemd setup with kdirmngr involved, I
expect more "me toos".
I generally do like systemd, but thats what I feel uneasy about.
If systemd is decided to become default init, its important to treat bugs like
I am back with insserv for months due to this issue.
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7