[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

No, no, no… drop GNOME.  

Useless anyway.  


On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote:

> Hi.
> Well I hope this doesn't turn into some kind of flame war... about
> systemd, GNOME or similar.
> In sid, gnome-settings-daemon depends now on systemd.
> I wouldn't have any issues with that, but at least right now systemd is
> for me not yet production ready (it seems to miss proper dm-crypt
> integration - or at least all those use cases where dm-crypt makes sense
> at all).
> Of course I can install the package but don't have to switch init= to
> it, nevertheless it seems that already this alone adds several things
> (udev rules, dbus stuff and some things in the maintainer scripts) that
> *will* get enabled.
> I've opened #726675, asking the GNOME developers what they think about
> this, but the only answer so far is basically "GNOME now depends on
> systemd".
> I personally think this is a design problem of GNOME upstream and we
> have previously seen that GNOME upstream forces their "blessings" upon
> their users - anyway... probably not something we can change from Debian
> side.
> So I guess the question is mainly,... what's the policy from Debian side
> now with such cases?
> And does anyone know whether it causes "hurt" to just install the
> package without using it?
> Thanks,
> Chris.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply to: