Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?
On 02/10/13 16:05, Dominik George wrote:
>> What does 'XXXXXX' stand for ?
> The short commit hash, as proposed in your initial mail.
In my first email, what you read as a commit hash was meant to be the date.
should be fine.
>> You should use a version derived from the date only. This way, you
>> won't be in
>> trouble if upstream switches to git.
> I absolutely do not see why this should be an issue. Using just a date is not uniquely idemtifiable.