Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?
thanks for your quick reply.
On 02/10/13 15:49, Dominik George wrote:
> Jerome BENOIT <firstname.lastname@example.org> schrieb:
>> I am packaging a versionless library software maintained via a
>> mercurial repository.
>> Is there any custom for this case ?
>> If not, can we use the version format 'hgYYYYMMDD' ?
>> Best regards,
> I tend to use:
> It sorts just below anything upstream might invent later (I don't like epoch).
What does 'XXXXXX' stand for ?
Thanks in advance,