Re: /etc/hosts and resolving of the local host/domainname - 127.0.0.1 vs. 127.0.1.1
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: /etc/hosts and resolving of the local host/domainname - 127.0.0.1 vs. 127.0.1.1
- From: Vincent Lefevre <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:54:05 +0200
- Message-id: <20130801225405.GA12046@xvii.vinc17.org>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <51F90AA1.email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20130731003045.GA6500@virgil.dodds.net> <51F8C0D5.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20130731104747.GB24562@xvii.vinc17.org> <51F90AA1.email@example.com>
On 2013-07-31 21:01:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 06:47 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But this wouldn't necessarily solve the mentioned "problem"
> > anyway.
> I'm not sure there's a problem anyway. I'm on the side of Steve, which
> is I think the current setup works quite well.
I agree. That's why I've put quotes.
> Our users can do a minimum of configuration, that's what I expect
> from anyone running a server/daemon anyway (things who are aimed at
> our users should be using localhost anyway).
Or better, report a bug against the broken software. Otherwise
different servers could require conflicting configurations!
Vincent Lefèvre <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)