Hi Paul, hi all, > Ahoy, fellow developers, > > > Having followed the recent threads, I've been growing concerned - not of > sticking with an old init system, or switching to a new one, or even the > god-aweful tone of every damn post on that thread (srsly guise). > > I'm mostly concerned that we, as a project, have a *hard* time trying > out big, breakey things -- I know, we're Debian, we're stable, I get > that. > [...] I feel the subject of this thread is not very well aligned with your reasoning - I don't think innovation==breaking things!? At least for myself the init system is a particularly bad example: I have quite a while ago stopped following that thread as the noise/information ratio was way too high for a sub-system I don't necessarily care about (I just need *some* working init). To re-iterate: are you worrying about innovation or about a lack of interest in breaking things? Best, Michael
Attachment:
pgpkU1WtzrmZ1.pgp
Description: PGP signature