[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> writes:

> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I've been administering UNIX systems professionally for 20 years,
>> from SunOS and ULTRIX through AIX, HP-UX, IRIX, Solaris, and Linux.
>> In my professional, *experienced* opinion, proper deployment of a
>> modern init system will make Debian considerably more robust, simpler
>> to develop, and simpler to administer.
> How much of that improvement would be realised if we added a
> dependable, declarative (i.e. config-based instead of
> shell-script-based) service configuration support to sysvinit ?

The "declarative configuration" part, of course. :)

Stig Sandbeck Mathisen (…who really could not resist)

Reply to: